In 2006, a story appeared in the newspapers, courtesy of Jeremy Paxman, who had been staying at Sandringham while researching his latest book, On Royalty. The gist of it was that the Prince of Wales was so fussy about his soft-boiled eggs that his staff would prepare up to seven for him every morning in the hope that at least one would be done to perfection.

When I first heard this, I clapped my hands together in glee. It seemed so perfect, so of a piece with what one already believed of Charles (unable even to put his own toothpaste on his toothbrush). Soon after, though, there came – boo! – a rebuttal. No, said a spokesman for Clarence House. Paxman’s anecdote was “totally untrue”. The Prince of Wales would eat his egg irrespective of whether or not its yolk was sufficiently runny. As denials go, this one was swift, and absolute. But it was also, to my mind, a failure. For one thing, it implicitly suggested that Charles thought himself quite the hero for ploughing manfully through a hard, dry egg. For another, more egg stories soon followed in its wake. Two years later, Mervyn Wycherley, Charles’s private chef during his first marriage, revealed that the prince’s security detail would inform the kitchen as soon as HRH was on his way home for tea. “His eggs had to be boiled for exactly four minutes,” said Wycherley. “It was never anything other than a four-minute egg. His detectives radioed his ETA ahead. I always kept three pans boiling – just to be safe.”

What is it with the royal family and eggs? If we are to believe Charles Oliver, a servant who worked at Buckingham Palace under Victoria, George VI and Queen Elizabeth II, and whose “lost” diaries were eventually used, in 2003, as the basis for a rather odd book called Dinner at Buckingham Palace, the royals have a “passion” for them. Like the rest of us, they like them scrambled, fried, boiled and poached, but they also enjoy them en cocotte à la crème (baked with cream, a treat they like to accompany with minced chicken); plat chasseur (garnished with chicken livers and a sauce of white wine, consommé and herbs); and farcis à la Chimay (stuffed with mushrooms and coated with Mornay sauce). Every day begins with an egg, and they’re eaten for tea, too – with crumpets, if you’re Prince Charles. The Queen favours brown eggs, believing that they taste better. Her great-great grandmother, Queen Victoria, ate her boiled egg, served in a golden egg cup, with a golden spoon.

Leaving aside the indelicate fact that constipation must surely be endemic in the royal palaces, this passion for eggs – such an everyday foodstuff and yet one that can be gussied up to a quite epic degree should cook be in possession of a sufficiently old-fashioned recipe book and large quantities of gelatin – pretty much sums up the royal family’s attitude to food. The modern royals, by which I mean Victoria onwards, have often managed to combine an unbounded extravagance with a certain ersatz asceticism.

Queen Victoria, who was convinced that “things taste better in smaller houses”, favoured plain food, a fact that set her against the fashion of the day, when French cuisine was all the rage (she had a French chef herself, in the form of Charles Elmé Francatelli, until he hit a maid and was dismissed). At home, she favoured pies and invalid soups – pearl barley or potato – washed down with her favourite drink, a mixture of claret and whisky.

On the other hand, when she visited Hatfield House, the home of the Marquess of Salisbury, in 1846, her host felt obliged to spend some £75,000 (at today’s prices) on food and drink for a three-day visit (£800 on turtle soup alone). She believed, too, in keeping an “imperial” table: one commensurate with her great nation’s place in the world. Dinners were elaborate, and, at lunch, curry and rice were always available, served by two Indian servants in elaborate uniforms of blue and gold.

Admittedly, these things do sometimes skip a generation. While he waited to become king, her son, Edward, the Prince of Wales, developed more lavish tastes. Abstemious he most certainly was not. A cooked breakfast would be accompanied by roast chicken and lobster salad to tide him over until lunch, which would itself consist of eight courses. This was followed by high tea, and then a dinner of 12 courses: two kinds of soup, whole salmons and turbots, vast saddles of mutton and sirloins of beef, not to mention several game birds, some devilled herrings and plenty of cheese. Finally, before bedtime, he would squeeze in a light supper of cakes and savouries. Edward, the playboy king, was so greedy that, at the theatre or opera, he would insist on an hour-long interval in order that he might take his supper in the royal box. Six heaving hampers of food – plovers’ eggs, cold trout, Parisian pastries – would duly be delivered by the palace.

George V was more modest: before he came to the throne, he lived in the relatively low-key York Cottage, on the Sandringham estate. It was decorated with new furniture, not old, as if he and his bride, the future Queen Mary, were just an ordinary middle-class couple, and he passed his time mostly in killing animals and tending his stamp collection. So when the First World War broke out, four years into his reign, it was perhaps unsurprising that Mary insisted on rationing in the palace – by some accounts even before the public was subjected to it. No one, according to her edict, was to eat more than two courses for breakfast, and the royal chefs were encouraged to create mock cutlets from minced meat. For his part, George prohibited the drinking of wine as long as the war lasted, and was happy to eat thin soup for elevenses, and mashed potato with everything.

Such deft PR continued with George VI, who also observed rationing during the Second World War. But George was married to Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother – a woman more royal than the royals. Last year, a collection of recipes by former staff and guests at the Queen Mother’s Scottish house, the Castle of Mey, was published, with a foreword by her ever-devoted grandson, Prince Charles – and just reading it is enough to make the arteries harden.

Elizabeth loved After Eight ice cream (to make quantities for six people you will need two boxes of After Eights and no fewer than six egg yolks), the Soufflé Rothschild created by Carême (its essential ingredient is Goldwasser, a strong liqueur containing flakes of gold leaf) and – what did I tell you about eggs? – Oeufs Drumkilbo, a sort of prawn-cocktail-meets-eggs-mayonnaise dish which she liked to serve on picnics. (Drumbilko is the next estate to Glamis Castle, the Queen Mother’s childhood hood; this dish was also served at the wedding of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson in 1986).

And so it continues, the strange coupling of decadence and moderation. The royals remind me of the friend who points out, when the bill comes, that they did not have pudding – shortly before announcing they are off to their new second home for the weekend. We know that the Queen favours Tupperware, the better to keep her breakfast cereal fresh. We know she likes Irish stew, rissoles (pheasant, preferably), and a good cup of tea. But we know, too, that every morning she writes her heart’s desires in her menu book for the staff, that diners at Balmoral are piped into dinner, that footmen abound in all her homes.

The Duke of Edinburgh is said to be obsessed with barbecuing in quiet corners of his wife’s estates, but is it really him who loads up the Land Rover with charcoal? And when we’re told that he takes his electric frying pan everywhere, who is it, I wonder, who packs it for him? As for Prince Charles’s instructions to his cook not to waste the lovage that grows tall in the Highgrove kitchen garden – it must be used for soup! – this sounds admirable only until you remember that Charles’ household is 159 strong, and that his personal spending rose last year by some 50%.

How much do royal tastes influence the rest of us? Not much is the truth. Victoria and Albert might have introduced us to the Christmas tree, but we can’t blame them for the turkey; they usually had beef (though on one occasion, or so I read, they enjoyed a swan). There is coronation chicken, invented by Constance Spry and Rosemary Hume for the banquet to mark the Queen’s coronation in 1953 (I don’t know whether the Queen likes coronation chicken herself but, made right, with poached chicken rather than leftovers, and a light dressing rather than a slick of mayonnaise and curry powder, it is delicious).

There is Prince Charles’s range of organic Duchy Originals, though when you see how much HRH’s oat cakes, jam and herbal tea cost, what you feel mostly is the need to run in the direction of Lidl. But very little else. If anything, they’re rushing towards us these days. The Duchess of Cambridge shops at Spar, Morrison’s and Waitrose – she pushes her own trolley! – and at an Anglesey butcher, where she was seen spending 82p on lamb’s liver to make a gravy for a pie (contrast this with the San Lorenzo-loving Princess Diana, whose cooking skills were so limited her chef had to leave her a note explaining how to operate the microwave).

I know there are those who feel that while the most prominent family in the land continues to stalk and to shoot, blood sports will never be outlawed. But since I am not anti these things, I can’t say I mind terribly much. I once went stalking in Scotland for this magazine, and the experience was so bone-achingly exhausting, I began to think Charles might be tougher than he sometimes seems.

For my own part, I associate the royal family very strongly indeed with icing. To be specific, with the bright blue and red icing I used to decorate some cakes I made with my stepmother when it was the Queen’s silver jubilee. (Ah, the innocence of 1977, when all the world was one giant street party!) And with a certain kind of kitschy biscuit tin. The other day, in Marks Spencer, I found my hand hovering for longer than it should have done over a tin of Diamond Jubilee shortbread. It was very pretty; quite understated as royal souvenirs go. I resisted, that day. But I know in my bones such a tin will eventually find its way into my shopping basket. Shortbread is always delicious – whether your attitude towards it is ironic, or not.

Read more



Cebu is in the world map as an important center of finely made furniture. One of its innovative exponents is Heritage Muebles Mirabile Export at Soong I in Mactan, Lapu-Lapu City.

This is a five-hectare realm where Charles U. Lim and Sunshine Barcelo Lim have their home, a school, a factory and an extensive display area. To celebrate the firm’s 18th anniversary they held the unveiling of their latest collection.

Guests of honor to cut the ribbon were Cebu Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia and lifestyle icon Rosebud Sala. They complimented the Lim couple for the furniture’s elegant lines, functionality and light material, good for indoors as well as outdoors.

It is not just tables, chairs, and all manner of seats, but also a whole gama of accessories. Among the admiring crowd were Gavin Bagares and Honey Loop who had helped organize the event; Joe Recio who won one of the chairs raffled off; and Cebu fashion czar Philip Rodriguez who had posed with the furniture for the glossy catalogue.

Also present were architect Jose Mari Cañizares, with wife Marilou and interior designer Christabelle  Muertegui; Diana Franco Ledesma, who found something for her new town house; Maybelline Te, who came from North Carolina; Len Len Jarque and Ana Climaco; Malou Hayden; and Loretta Dytian, complimented for the great buffet spread by Creative Cuisine.

50 years of married life

Rolando “Sonny” Espina and his wife of 49 years, Mila Castillo Espina, celebrated their golden wedding anniversary a full year ahead. There was a solemn mass at the St. Exekiel chapel in the Basak, Pardo, campus of the University of San Jose-Recoletos.

“They prepared everything,” said Mila, who joined the university as its dean of Arts and Sciences in 1964. Guests received a leaflet wherein she recounted, with quite a dose of good humor, her and Sonny’s love story.

They met in March 1960 in Manila in, of all places, a wake for Sonny’s uncle. Elvis Presley was Mila’s idol at the time. Sonny looked, sang and played the guitar just like Elvis. By July they were “steadies.”

The love story evolved through the next three years. Mila taught at various schools in Manila. Sonny had a good job and studied in the evenings. When he graduated in March 1963 he was offered a job in a finance/marketing firm in Cebu. They needed him as soon as possible.

Their world seemed to shatter. Someone told Mila she’d lose Sonny as “Cebu has many pretty girls.” On the other hand, a well-meaning mentor advised,” Have a secret wedding.”

On April 22, 1963 they hied off to Bulacan for a civil wedding. Next day, April 23 at 5 p.m., hours before Sonny’s flight to Cebu, they were married secretly at the Lourdes Parish in Quezon City. Best friends Proceso and Linda Jacobo were witnesses.

They parted ways, and just as the song goes, absence made their hearts grow fonder. Definitely not “out of sight, out of mind.” By Christmas 1963 they were together again, in Manila, and told their families.

They settled in Cebu in June 1964 and made their home in Tisa, Labangon, Cebu City. “It has been smooth and rough sailing,” Mila says, recalling laughter and tears, according to what life inevitably brings about.

Through it all, they love the same food, songs, movies, and TV programs. They have travelled together, and bonded with their respective sets of friends and relatives. “We even share the same vitamins,” Mila says with a beaming smile.

Golden memories

Speaking of golden wedding anniversaries, Silvestre and Raddie (nèe Goopio) Calomarde recalled that morning in 1962 when they walked the aisle of the Cebu Metropolitan Cathedral for a very important date. They chose the same venue last April 14 for a solemn mass of thanksgiving and renewal of vows.

Fr. Dave Villaceran officiated. Sponsors were Honorary Consul of Belgium Enrique Benedicto with Aida Uy, Victor and Leny Dumon, lawyer Manuel Go and Milagros Ecarma, Alberto and Herminia Herrera, Manuel Lebumfacil and Ma. Nimfa Escario, lawyer Adelino Sitoy and Bella Caloza, Mr. and Ms Cornelio Amazona.

Sil and Raddie’s children, grandchildren and great grandchildren figured prominently in the entourage. Maids of honor were daughters Jen Elizabeth C. Siarot and Joy C. Formento, while sons Jed and Jef Calomarde were best men.

The bridesmaids were granddaughters Christine Arra, Sydnie Jane, Bianca Marie, Therese Claire, Kathreen Claire, Leah Eloisa, Louise Anne, Catherine Marie and Kirsten Dawn.

Groomsmen were grandsons Francis Anthony, James Michael, Jon Dominic, Dan Christian, Melvin Belli, John Vincent and Adam Shawneil. Philip Anthony, Joshua Matthew and Kelvin Silvestre bore the bible, coins and rings, respectively.

More family members attended the couple during the rites: candle sponsors Moises Cañete and Didith Calomarde; veil sponsors Arden Siarot and Loryve Calomarde; cord sponsors Francis Anthony and Melanie Calomarde.

The reception and brunch followed at the ballroom of Holiday Plaza Hotel. This was an occasion to reminisce about sundry anecdotes and experiences. For one thing, Sil’s father, the late journalist Pedro Calomarde was a legend in his own time.

His paper, The Morning Times, was founded at the height of World War II, printed clandestinely in the mountains of Barili (southern Cebu) with news derived from a radio. The Japanese never discovered it. Later, as a daily, it counted with subscribers from abroad, including Queen Elizabeth II.

Read more



Police are calling a drive-by shooting that left at least five bullet holes in the exterior of a northeast Calgary home on Friday night a “targeted attack.”

No one was hurt in the incident, which took place in the 100 block of Del Ray Crescent in Monterey Park about 10:45 p.m. However, three people were home at the time, and one of the bullets went through a front window and ended up lodged in a piece of furniture inside the home. The other bullets were fired into the garage or struck the exterior of the home below the living room window.

Duty inspector Darren Cave said one of the individuals who lives in the house, a young man in his late teens identified as the son of the homeowners, is known to police.

“If an individual is known to us, it goes with a lifestyle, and that’s the angle we’re looking at right now,” Cave said. “That because of his background, that is the reason for the targeted attack on the residence.”

It’s not the first time police have responded to a complaint at the home, he said. In 2010, a threatening statement appeared in graffiti on the garage door of the house.

Neighbours on the block where the incident occurred said they didn’t know the family personally, and noted the street is usually quiet and peaceful.

“I’ve never seen so many police cars in this area,” said Clarence Williams, who lives a few doors down from the house where the shooting took place. “It’s a very quiet street. You don’t even usually hear a car drive by.”

Another neighbour, who did not want to be identified, said it’s nerve-racking to have such an incident take place so close to her home.

“It’s going to be hard for me to let my kids play outside now,” she said.

Police say they are looking into the possible existence of surveillance footage that may have captured the shooting on tape. A vehicle was seen leaving the scene immediately after the incident.

The residents of the home, including the young man who has a history with the police, have been questioned.

“My understanding is he has not been entirely co-operative with our investigators at this point,” Cave said.

Neighbours who may have observed anything suspicious at the time of the shooting are encouraged to contact the Calgary Police Service.

astephenson@calgaryherald.com

Read more




istock

If you hang out with industrial designers, one thing you notice is that they’re really into chairs. In fact, you can often guess a designer’s favorite chair maker from his or her shirt. Black button-down? Mies van der Rohe. Black turtleneck? Peter Opsvik. Low-cut black V-neck and conspicuous hair product? The Campanas. Every design school graduate wants a cool-looking chair in his or her portfolio, and chair design can be a savagely competitive field.

I hate to rain on their parade, but here’s the thing: Chairs are evil. All of them. No designer has ever made a good chair, because it is impossible. Chairs are a health hazard, they’re morally troubling, and we’ve become dependent on them—and it’s not clear that we’ll ever be free.

It sounds absurd to claim that chairs are dangerous. They seem almost too boring to be harmful. But when you read all the recent headlines about the dangers of sitting—the risk of heart disease, obesity, diabetes, depression, and practically innumerable orthopedic injuries—what you are really seeing is an indictment of what we sit on. The real issue is that sitting, in our society, usually means putting your body in a raised seat with back support. The problem, in other words, is chairs.

Different chairs get different things wrong. Uncomfortable chairs typically put adverse pressure on the body, or require excessive muscular work in order to sit. Comfy chairs are even worse. By encouraging you to remain in a single static position for long periods without moving, they put extended, unrelieved stress on your spine and weaken your muscles.

Starting in the 1970s, idealistic furniture companies like Herman Miller began to develop what were intended to be safe chair designs based on the murky sort-of-science of ergonomics. But even today, no one is positive what a “good” chair would do. Some ergonomists have argued that the spine should be allowed to round forward and down in a C-shaped position to prevent muscular strain, but this puts pressure on the internal organs and can cause spinal discs to rupture over time. Others advocate for lumbar support, but this can weaken musculature in the long run, increasing the likelihood of the very injuries it’s meant to prevent. There have been similar debates over seat height, angle, and depth; head, foot, and arm support; and padding. Galen Cranz, a sociologist of architecture and perhaps the world’s preeminent chair scholar, has called ergonomics “confused and even silly.”

A number of Scandinavian designers have designed ball chairs, kneeling chairs, and chairs that encourage sitting in several different positions. These are improvements. But they’re not total fixes. They also frequently don’t work properly at common table heights, and not everyone wants to be the guy at work who sits on a ball.

If chairs are such a dumb idea, how did we get stuck with them? Why does our culture demand that we spend most of every day sitting on objects that hurt us?

The answer lies in class politics. Chairs aren’t just about not wanting to stand; they’re about status, power, and control. Ask any furniture historians about the origins of the chair and they’ll gleefully tell you that it all started with the throne.

Some time in the Stone Age, probably between 6,000 and 12,000 years ago, high-status individuals began to sit on small raised platforms, just large enough to hold a single person and with a backrest to support or frame the sitter. The earliest evidence of these primitive thrones comes from figurines excavated in southeastern Europe, but single-person seats with a back were important status symbols in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt as well.

During the Middle Ages, chairs were not common in the Western world. After the Visigoths sacked Rome, their habits of squatting and sitting on the ground became predominant. Besides, until the Renaissance, even wealthy feudal households had very little furniture, because they had to keep moving around to avoid getting sacked themselves. The richest families would have had a single massive chair for the exclusive use of the master of the house; this chair was typically too heavy to move (to keep it from getting stolen when the house got sacked).

Eventually life got easier for the rich, and lavish furniture became more widespread among the upper class. Style became increasingly important in furniture. But chairs remained an accessory for relatively affluent households. Poor people sat on stools, benches, their beds, or improvised objects like barrels and trunks.

That changed with the Industrial Revolution. Suddenly chairs were being made cheaply in factories, and more people could afford to sit like the rich. At the same time, labor was being sedentarized: As workers moved en masse from agriculture to factories and offices, laborers spent more and more time sitting in those mass-produced chairs. Chairs became a tool for teachers to control the movement of children, whose healthy tendency toward activity made them difficult to teach. Today, by the time we reach adulthood, most of us have lost the musculature to sit comfortably for prolonged periods without back support.

Chairs, then, are a sort of inanimate parasite, ensuring their continued production by addicting each successive generation of kids. They’re also here to stay for the foreseeable future, and designers are going to keep making chairs as long as there’s a demand for them. But perhaps we could use our cultural capital to popularize alternatives: first backless stools, perhaps, and eventually indoor and outdoor spaces that encourage healthier patterns of activity.

Meanwhile, if you want to sit healthily, you’ll have to take matters into your own hands. Many ergonomists recommend that you stay seated for no more than 20 minutes at a time.

You should probably get up right now and walk around.


Try BostonGlobe.com today and get two weeks FREE.
Colin McSwiggen is pursuing a master of arts degree in design at the Royal College of Art in London. He can be reached at colin.mcswiggen@network.rca.ac.uk. This piece is adapted from Jacobin Magazine (jacobinmag.com).

Read more



“I refer to it as a seat, but not a chair. It’s not a ’sit down’ device,” Martin Keen, founder of a popular footwear company that bears his last name, said in a call on his mobile phone as he rushed around New York City. He was describing his newest products: furniture, and definitely not shoes. The Locus seat and desk, pictured above, launched on May 19 at the International Contemporary Furniture Fair, a leading design trade show at the Jacob K. Javits Center through May 22.

“Think of the saying ‘by the seat of your pants,” Keen told me as I could hear sirens wailing in the background.

The phrase that Keen used is appropriate; the contraption that he designed is inspired by a do-it-yourself version of a seat and desk that Keen improvised back in 1994, using an antique tractor part as a starting point. A product designer who has held positions at sneaker makers K-Swiss and Saucony, he had wanted to find a more comfortable way of working at the time. And he had long admired the simple and ergonomic shape of tractor seats.

“They were made of cast steel, and farmers rode tractors for hours,” he explained. “They’d be riding behind horses, plowing fields–it probably wasn’t easy. But these old seats have the contour of human posteriors; they’re simple–there’s no superfluous design to them.” So he purchased one, and then created a stool to use with a tall table in his workspace, using the tractor part as the substitute for a chair. Back then, as well as now, he liked to design in positions that weren’t sitting or standing, exactly, but sort of leaning back and forth and doing both, as he described his work style to me.

“GOOFY” PROTOTYPES, ENTREPRENEURIAL SUCCESS

In the years between 1994 and 2003, when Keen launched his shoe company, Keen Footwear, he also wished he could also launch a furniture company to share his invention with the world. Keen Footwear took off, and didn’t provide him with time to pursue that vision. Keen’s shoe business is best known for making practical sandals made with a proprietary breathable, yet waterproof, material that allows “vapors” to escape (as the company describes the fabric’s abilities, wink wink). The brand has a wide variety of fans, from active pre-schoolers to outdoorsy adults.

Keen recently sold his stake in the company–which is privately held–to his business partner, to focus on his long-held dream of becoming a furniture designer. Since about a year ago, he created a new company, Focal Upright Furniture, and devoted himself to manufacturing a version of his tractor-seat inspired work gear for the masses.

The company’s first offering is the Locus seat, an un-chair, if you follow Keen’s reasoning, that features a pivoting leg. It adjusts as the sitter moves to support a natural center of balance. The design has a patent pending. The main concept of the chair’s benefits seems similar to that of sitting on a giant, inflated ball at one’s desk (you know, that office trend that seems to scream “I am fit!”). Both promote the act of making many micro- movements throughout the workday, to keep muscles moving and blood flowing instead of being still in front of a computer screen.

Keen told me that he drew upon two decades’ worth of research on the human body, which he engaged in as a footwear designer, and applied it to the development of the Locus seat. He also consulted with ergonomics experts. He built 17 prototypes, tested by volunteers of various physical types over the years.

He doesn’t have quantitative data yet to illustrate the product’s health benefits, but told me that his new company is working on gathering statistics and should share it next month.

Yet he did offer as anecdotal reference his own career as an entrepreneur, developed while working at the very first tractor-seat prototype of his new products, as evidence that it’s a comfortable option to traditional desks. He said that that potential users shouldn’t raise their eyebrows at the unusual design.

“When I’d first wear prototypes of my goofy sandals sailing, I didn’t care what I looked like,” Keen said, referring to the shoes he developed and the company that was eventually declared “2003 Launch of the Year” by trade publication Footwear News. Today, Keen Footwear–whose annual revenues were estimated at $240 million in 2011–also sells bags and socks, as well as brand extensions into various types of rugged shoes. He believes that his unusual new designs for a seat and desk may have similar impact in the furniture world, and his own story could be a selling point. “This type of seat allowed me to be creative…and build Keen Footwear,” he said.

PREMIUM PRICES, A PARTICULAR AESTHETIC

The Locus seat will be available at a discounted introductory price of $480 (or $680 for a luxury version, with leather and carbon details), until August 1; the seat combined with a desk will be discounted at $780 for the same period. After that, prices will go up to a suggested price of $650-850 for the seat (depending on materials) and $950 for the desk. They will be available for shipment in September.

Yes, the prices of the Locus seat and desk are premium, and the look could be described as, well, a tractor seat/school desk/stationary bike, with a footrest that slightly recalls a skateboard. It will likely appeal to a very particular outdoorsy aesthetic. But that might be an advantage in terms of building an audience, rather than a limitation. One can imagine sporty fans of Keen Footwear perched on Locus seats, appreciative for the chance at creating a more active and healthy work environment for themselves.

While launching an office-furniture company might seem a stretch for a well-established footwear designer, it may make sense as a calculated risk for Keen, specifically. As a designer who was unafraid to remake outdoor shoes in a practical yet experimental way, he might be able to apply savvy lessons learned in marketing and manufacturing from his experience at Keen Footwear that could be powerful elements in building his new brand.

Images: Focal Upright Furniture; Alexander Muse/Flickr

Read more







TamaraPetrovic1.png

Furniture designer Tamara Petrovic is one half of 0 TO 1—a studio that she and architect Garner Oh founded in 2009—but she presides over their showing for NY Design Week at Con Artist NYC. Called Industrial + Industrial, the exhibition is the result of a project to create design objects from the remnants of industrial manufacturing.

TamaraPetrovic2.png

Petrovic came up with many clever design solutions by making simple alterations to materials like felt, cork and cardboard. Fruit Play is a fruit plate made from a thick slab of cork with holes cut out in different sizes. Bright fruit not only looks great in contrast with the natural brown cork, but the softness of the material and the size of the holes ensure that the fruit makes minimal contact with the container, “extending fruit shelf life and staging each piece openly.”

TamaraPetrovic3.png

TamaraPetrovic4.png

Snowflakes is a series of trivets and coasters made by stringing felt balls together in a circle. Flowers also repurposes wool felt, this time into a set of hairpins, but the real standouts are Cylinder 14 and Cylinder 16, two chairs made from recycled cardboard cores that were once used as rolls to wrap fabric or packaging materials. The challenge here was to “reuse the material and reveal its intrinsic beauty.”

The chairs and ottomans range from $400 – $2,200, depending on whether you opt for for the raw, untreated cardboard and speckled gray industrial wool felt, or the higher end version which uses softer, better quality wool and cardboard that’s been sanded and treated with a special paint that includes paprika (it sounds weird but it works). The chairs are soft and extremely comfy and can even be customized to fit your personal back support needs.

TamaraPetrovic5.png

TamaraPetrovic6.png

Industrial + Industrial is currently on view, but the official reception is Sunday, May 20, 5-7pm at 157 Suffolk Street. RSVP required (studio@0-to-1.com).

<!–

tweetmeme_style = ‘compact’;
tweetmeme_url = ‘http://www.core77.com/blog/ny_design_week/ny_design_week_tamara_petrovic_at_industrial_industrial_22487.asp’;

–>

facebook

delicious

stumbleupon

digg

NY Design Week: Northern Oddities, cute Finnish design

NY Design Week: Ode to Kvadrat's Hallingdal 65

Read more



ASDA Stores Limited: Retailing Company Profile SWOT Report – new company profile report

London 5/19/2012 02:27 PM GMT (TransWorldNews)

Companiesandmarkets.com

Recent Submissions

Denki Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha: Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Rovi Corporation: Business and Consumer Services Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Pirelli C. S.p.A: Industrial Goods Machinery Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Asda Stores Ltd. (Asda) is an in-store and online retailer of food and non-food products. The company’s product portfolio includes groceries, clothing, electrical products, furniture, garden, house wares, toys, baby items, DIY products, sports and leisure, jewelry, gifts, mobile phones and other consumer products. Asda also provides a range of financial services through its stores and website. In addition to national and global brands, the company offers private brands, including George and Asda. It operates through 542 stores. The company is headquartered in Leeds, UK.

Summary

Canadean’s ‘ASDA Stores Limited: Retailing Company Profile SWOT Report’ is a crucial resource for industry executives and anyone looking to access key information about ASDA Stores Limited.

Canadean’s ‘ASDA Stores Limited: Retailing Company Profile SWOT Report’ report utilizes a wide range of primary and secondary sources, which are analyzed and presented in a consistent and easily accessible format. Canadean strictly follows a standardized research methodology to ensure high levels of data quality and these characteristics guarantee a unique report.

Scope

• Examines and identifies key information and issues about ‘ASDA Stores Limited’ for business intelligence requirements.
• Studies and presents the company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities (growth potential) and threats (competition). Strategic and operational business information is objectively reported.
• The profile also contains information on business operations, company history, major products and services, prospects, key employees, locations and subsidiaries.

Click for Report details:ASDA Stores Limited: Retailing Company Profile SWOT Report

enquiries@companiesandmarkets.com
www.companiesandmarkets.com/Market/Retail/Company-Profile/ASDA-Stores-Limited-Retailing-Company-Profile-SWOT-Report/RPT1043985?aCode=e7702a5b-ad88-47dd-bb7a-a58072d4bda2

Read more



SBI office gutted in fire
Indore: An office of State Bank of India was gutted in a devastating fire that broke out in the wee hours of Saturday near GPO here, a fire official said.

A number of computers, air conditioners, imported furniture, files and almirahs with documents turned into carbon and ashes, fire officer Bhagirath Dabhi said.

SBI office gutted in fire



The fire broke out in the loan department located on third floor of the SBI building around 3.30 am, and it was extinguished by early morning when two fire tenders were pressed into action, Dabhi said adding the fire might have been caused by short circuit.

SBI office gutted in fire

PTI

Read more



Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

London 5/19/2012 12:23 PM GMT (TransWorldNews)

Companiesandmarkets.com

Recent Submissions

Village Super Market, Inc: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

HSN, Inc: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Mothercare plc: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc (Morrisons) is a supermarket chain, which offers a wide range of products, including groceries, fish, meat, bakery items, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, dairy-based products, pharmaceuticals, and a variety of products for the home, such as garden furniture and tools. Morrisons has a network of 439 stores, which offer its entire product range, along with products from renowned brands. The company is vertically integrated and controls operations throughout its supply chain; for instance, Morrisons owns all of its bakeries, processing facilities and its whole transport fleet. Morrison principally operates in the UK and the Netherlands. The company is headquartered in Bradford, UK.

Summary

Canadean’s ‘Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report’ is a crucial resource for industry executives and anyone looking to access key information about Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC.

Canadean’s ‘Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report’ report utilizes a wide range of primary and secondary sources, which are analyzed and presented in a consistent and easily accessible format. Canadean strictly follows a standardized research methodology to ensure high levels of data quality and these characteristics guarantee a unique report.

Scope

• Examines and identifies key information and issues about ‘Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC’ for business intelligence requirements.
• Studies and presents the company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities (growth potential) and threats (competition). Strategic and operational business information is objectively reported.
• Provides data on company financial performance.
• The profile also contains information on business operations, company history, major products and services, prospects, key employees, locations and subsidiaries.

Click for Report details:Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report

enquiries@companiesandmarkets.com
www.companiesandmarkets.com/Market/Retail/Company-Profile/Wm-Morrison-Supermarkets-PLC-Retailing-Company-Profile-SWOT-Financial-Report/RPT1043872?aCode=e7702a5b-ad88-47dd-bb7a-a58072d4bda2

Read more



Furniture Brands International, Inc: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

London 5/19/2012 11:40 AM GMT (TransWorldNews)

Companiesandmarkets.com

Recent Submissions

Denki Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha: Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Rovi Corporation: Business and Consumer Services Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Pirelli C. S.p.A: Industrial Goods Machinery Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report – new company profile report

Furniture Brands International, Inc. (FBN) designs, manufactures, sources, markets and distributes home furnishings. The product portfolio includes case goods, stationary upholstery products, occasional furniture, motion upholstered furniture, and decorative accessories and accent pieces. The company sells its products under various brand names including Hickory Chair, Broyhill, Thomasville, Lane, Drexel Heritage, Pearson, Henredon, Laneventure and Maitland-Smith. FBN markets its products through multi-channel strategies, which include its own stores, mass merchant stores, single-branded and independent dealers, and specialized interior designers. FBN is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, US.

Summary

Canadean’s ‘Furniture Brands International, Inc: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report’ is a crucial resource for industry executives and anyone looking to access key information about Furniture Brands International, Inc..

Canadean’s ‘Furniture Brands International, Inc: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report’ report utilizes a wide range of primary and secondary sources, which are analyzed and presented in a consistent and easily accessible format. Canadean strictly follows a standardized research methodology to ensure high levels of data quality and these characteristics guarantee a unique report.

Scope

• Examines and identifies key information and issues about ‘Furniture Brands International, Inc.’ for business intelligence requirements.
• Studies and presents the company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities (growth potential) and threats (competition). Strategic and operational business information is objectively reported.
• Provides data on company financial performance and competitive benchmarking.
• The profile also contains information on business operations, company history, major products and services, prospects, key employees, locations and subsidiaries.

Click for Report details:Furniture Brands International, Inc: Retailing Company Profile, SWOT Financial Report

enquiries@companiesandmarkets.com
www.companiesandmarkets.com/Market/Retail/Company-Profile/Furniture-Brands-International-Inc-Retailing-Company-Profile-SWOT-Financial-Report/RPT1043798?aCode=e7702a5b-ad88-47dd-bb7a-a58072d4bda2

Read more



« Older Entries